Compliance Provider Scorecard
Compliance Provider Scorecard
86
100
0
1
One roof, many jobs — ComplyCube packages eKYC, KYB, and AML under one API with fast doc+selfie verification, active/passive liveness, sanctions/PEP/adverse-media checks, and more. Good docs, SDKs, and a public pricing page make it easy to get started. For fintech, crypto, or gambling teams looking for speed and no-fuss multi-provider bundles without sewing together five vendors, it should be on your shortlist. Watch-outs: KYB depth and coverage varies by registry/jurisdiction, and you'll want to confirm KYB coverage and monitoring needs in advance of scaling.
One roof, many jobs — ComplyCube packages eKYC, KYB, and AML under one API with fast doc+selfie verification, active/passive liveness, sanctions/PEP/adverse-media checks, and more. Good docs, SDKs, and a public pricing page make it easy to get started. For fintech, crypto, or gambling teams looking for speed and no-fuss multi-provider bundles without sewing together five vendors, it should be on your shortlist. Watch-outs: KYB depth and coverage varies by registry/jurisdiction, and you'll want to confirm KYB coverage and monitoring needs in advance of scaling.
86/100
Total Score
- Onboarding & IDV88/100 AmazingFast document + selfie verification with active/passive liveness; SDK guidance helps keep UX tight.
- AML Screening85/100 AmazingSanctions, PEP, and adverse-media checks via API (standard or extensive modes) for people and companies.
- KYB & Coverage82/100 Very goodDirector verification, registry search, and disqualified-director screening; coverage depends on local data sources.
Good for
- All-in-one stack — KYC, KYB, AML screening in one platform/API.
- Liveness built-in — Active/passive PAD to block spoofs and replays.
- Lower friction to try — Public pricing + free-trial path.
Think twice if
- KYB depth varies — Registry coverage and data freshness differ by market—validate early.
- Limited third-party benchmarks — Fewer independent performance metrics; rely on your POC.
- Monitoring specifics — Screening is clear; ongoing monitoring scope may need scoping per use case.
